TECH TALK
By Billie Peterson, billie_peterson@baylor.edu
Dear Tech Talk—
We desperately need another electronic classroom, but our library doesn’t have any extra rooms or unused space that can be dedicated to another classroom, especially one filled with large, cumbersome computers and wires. Please — can you suggest a solution for our problem?
—Desperately Seeking Instruction Space
Dear Desperately—
A possible solution that comes to mind for those of you with this problem and an adventuresome spirit — consider using laptop computers in a wireless electronic classroom. Although still in the realm of the “frontier”, wireless technology has undergone some major changes in the past twelve months. Major issues from a year ago are now dissipating.
To begin with, what is a wireless network? A wireless network IS NOT a network completely devoid of wires, but at the local level, individual computers connect to the main network without using a physical wire. Instead the PCs use a signal to connect to a nearby physical device (an access point). The access point IS physically connected to the main network with wires.
Briefly, there are three methods that can be used to implement a wireless network: Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS), Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS), and infrared. With FHSS, “short bursts of data hop from one frequency to another based on a predetermined pattern, and the transmitter and receiver must synchronize this hop sequence” in order to transfer data. Whereas DSSS “is a high-bandwidth” technology that spreads signals over a wide range”, using a “redundant bit pattern”. There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these methods, and both are supported by wireless vendors. More detailed information about these two methods can be found in Ruber’s article. The infrared solution is less popular, most likely because its success requires that the transmitted signal be beamed in a straight line to the receiving device. For example, in order for someone to transfer data from one Palm Pilot to another (using infrared technology), both Palm Pilots must be in the same room and in relative alignment with each other. Both the DSSS and FHSS methods use radio frequencies and are less hindered by spatial positioning and physical obstacles such as walls and floors.
Computers, in this case laptop computers, capable of receiving a wireless signal need to be at the receiving end. Computers with wireless capabilities can be obtained by purchasing a wireless card (for about $200) for each laptop or by purchasing laptops with wireless capability already built into the unit. (Although not all laptops come with built-in wireless capability, it’s a desired feature because it eliminates the potential of damage to the wireless card.) The laptop is then configured to connect to the wireless network. Additionally, if library patrons have their own laptops with wireless capabilities, they can be given the information to configure their laptops to communicate with the library’s wireless network.
There are some definite advantages to having a wireless network available in a library:
- Wireless networks can sometimes circumvent the cost of installing a wired network, especially in areas of a building where thick concrete, asbestos, architectural features, historical preservation, or other similar obstacles exist.
- Because there are no wires to run, except from the access point devices to the wired network, installation can take place very quickly.
- Rooms in the library that aren’t tied to wired usage become more flexible.
- The laptops are available for patron checkout or other uses when not needed for classes.
Imagine a perfect world in which you have a room in the library with wireless capabilities,
modular tables and chairs, and about 20-25 laptops configured to work with the wireless
network. An electronic instruction session is scheduled in the room. Setup time is needed
to get the room ready for the instruction — moving tables and chairs, retrieving and setting
up the laptops, checking everything to be sure it works properly. During the class
instruction is provided as usual, but with an additional advantage of more eye contact with
the students because there are no bulky computers sitting on tables. After the class is over,
the laptops are stored away and the room is now available for other uses. During peak
instruction periods, the room may only be used for electronic instruction, but what about
those lulls in instruction activity that all libraries experience at some point? With the
implementation of a wireless network and the use of laptops, a room that might otherwise
contain barriers (cumbersome computers and wires) that hinder its use, becomes a room that
invites usage in a variety of ways.
Sound too good to be true? Well, there are some problems associated with wireless networks:
- Although the speed of wireless networks continues to increase (having gone from 2 Mbps to 11 Mbps within the last 18 months), it will always lag behind the speed of most wired networks.
- There are bandwidth issues associated with having several computers accessing the wireless network at the same time. Instructing the users of 20 laptops to connect to a networked resource (such as a web-based database) at the same time may not be a trivial matter within a wireless network. Response under these conditions needs to be tested and addressed.
- Wireless networks aren’t as secure as wired networks.
- When moving around in a wireless network, signals may deteriorate and data or the connection may be lost (although this would be less of a problem in a classroom setting).
- Installation of a wireless network may not be the least expensive way to provide network access to an area. The cost effectiveness will depend on the physical barriers that need to be addressed if a wired network is installed.
Even with these caveats, a wireless electronic classroom that uses laptops in the library may be worthy of consideration. The technological disadvantages, such as speed and contention for bandwidth, are improving at a rapid pace. Twelve to eighteen months from now, the wireless network landscape will most likely be substantially changed.
Of course it isn’t sound planning to implement a wireless electronic classroom simply because it’s the latest technology. Examine your libraries specific network and space needs. Are there aspects of a wireless network that might address identified problems? If so, then the implementation of a wireless network would bear further investigation. If you decide to investigate wireless technology further, some key wireless vendors are:
Breezecom <http://www.breezecom.com>
Cisco Wireless <http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/44/jump/wireless.shtml>
Lucent WaveLAN <http://www.wavelan.com/>
Proxim <http://www.proxim.com>
RoamAbout <http://www.enterasys.com/wireless/>
RadioLAN <http://www.radiolan.com>
Additional Resources:
Bobicki, Jeff. “The Wireless Connection”. School Library Journal
(Supplement Summer 2000):
25-26.
Brewin, Bob and James Cope. “The Big LAN on Campus is Wireless”. Computer World
(September 4, 2000): 1.
“Building a Wireless Classroom”
<http://is.asu.edu/r%26d/wireless/wireless.html>
“Bytes Without Wires: Wireless LANs and WANs in Libraries”. LITA Emerging Technologies Interest Group at ALA New Orleans,
June 27, 1999. <http://www.ofaolain.com/profdev/ala99/>
Clark, Elizabeth. “Pulling the Plug on the Local Loop”. Network Magazine
(June 1, 1999)
<http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20000509S0025>
DeCandido, Grace. “Wireless Networks: Unplugged, and Play”. Public Libraries (July/August 2000):203,205.
Also: PLA Tech Notes <http://www.pla.org/technotes/wireless.html> .
Engeldinger, Eugene, Michael G. Love, Angela Myatt Quick, and Carol Sabbar. “Wireless Laptops for the Library and the Portable
Classroom”. EDUCAUSE 2000. <http://www.carthage.edu/ais/presenting/educause2000/EDUCAUSE.htm>
Griffioen, James, W. Brent Seales, and James E. Lumpp Jr. “Teaching in Realtime Wireless Classrooms”.
1998 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
<http://www.dcs.uky.edu/~wc/publication/teaching.html>
Griffioen, James, W. Brent Seales, James E. Lumpp Jr., and Tom Kay.
“Experience Developing Wireless Networks for Interactive Multimedia Instruction”.
<http://www.dcs.uky. edu/~wc/publication/design.html>
Parker, John. “Hotel School Books a System; Cornell Checks in to Wireless LAN to Improve Computer Accommodations”. PC Week
(April 19, 1999): 129.
Piper, Dave. “Using Wireless Technology to Solve a Computer Classroom Design Problem”.
Poster Session presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, May 5-11, 2000 Vancouver, BC.
<http://www.ahsc.arizona.edu/wireless/>
Quick, Angela Myatt and Chris Grugel. “Using a Portable Wireless Electronic Classroom for Information Literacy Instruction”. LOEX of the West 2000.
<http://www.carthage. edu/ais/presenting/loex2000/loex_bi_pwec.htm>
Ruber, Peter. “Wires Not Included”. Network Magazine
(June 1, 1999)
<http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20000509S0032>
Schneider, Karen. “Look Ma, No Wires.” American Libraries
(March 2000):83.
Sullivan, Kristina B. “Wireless Solutions Extend LAN’s Reach”. PC Week
(September 7, 1998): 77.
TelecomResearch.com
<http://www.telecomresearch.com>
As always, send questions and comments to:
Snail Mail: Tech Talk
Billie Peterson
Moody Memorial Library
P. O. Box 97143
Waco, TX 76798-7143
E-Mail: Billie Peterson@baylor.edu